RAWA Hits Senate Floor as GOP 2016 Presidential Hopeful Lindsey Graham Gets Lambasted by PPA

Senator Lindsey Graham’s introduction of RAWA to the Senate this week came under fire from John Pappas of the Poker Players Alliance, who questioned its timing to a near-empty home that had adjourned. (Image: motherjones.com)

RAWA, the brainchild of Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) has now been introduced to the Senate.

The legislation, formally known because the Restoration of America’s Wire Act, seeks to restore exactly what opponents of online gambling believe become the initial and interpretation that is correct of 1961 Federal Wire Act, before it was reinterpreted by the Department of Justice (DoJ) in 2011.

The Wire Act, in its wording that is original forbidden ‘betting or wagering’ using ‘a cable communication facility for the transmission.’

The DoJ’s appropriate opinion of 2011 asserted this merely relevant to sports betting over online, rather than poker or casino video gaming, which paved the way for specific states to legalize and regulate gambling that is online their boundaries in the previous few years.

Graham’s bill, if passed away, would effortlessly ban all forms of online gambling at the level that is federal apart from horse race betting and fantasy sports. No exemptions would be made for the three states (Nevada, New Jersey, and Delaware) which have already opted to modify online gaming, or, indeed, for the dozen or so that have chosen to supply online lottery ticket sales.

Timing Is Suspect

It’s long been expected that Graham, whom sponsored the bill last 12 months, would present RAWA to the Senate at some point in 2015, but, according to online poker lobby group the Poker Players Alliance, the timing is profoundly suspect.

‘As the eyes of the nation are focused on South Carolina following a recent tragic event, I think I speak for most Americans once I express profound disappointment in Senator Graham for choosing this time for you to advance a bill for the sole advantage of a billionaire political donor,’ said John Pappas, executive director of the PPA.

‘The Congress made a decision to adjourn early so they could go to services on in Senator Graham’s home-state friday. Unfortunately, Senator Graham has not reset his priorities and picked a very unfortunate time for you to engage on the web gaming debate.’

Pappas also accuses Graham of cronyism. The Senator recently announced their decision to run for president, and lots of commentators genuinely believe that RAWA is important for Graham as a means of securing the sponsorship, and campaign donations of LVS Chairman Sheldon planet 7 oz contact Adelson, who’s known for his virulent hatred of all of the things related to online gaming.

California Online Poker Hearings

‘In 2014, following private conferences between billionaire casino mogul Sheldon Adelson and Senator Lindsey Graham and several Adelson-sponsored fundraising events, Senator Graham introduced similar legislation to ban states’ from authorizing Internet gambling of their own borders,’ said the PPA in an official statement this week.

‘Though Senator Graham has typically been a staunch states’ rights advocate, this legislation would overturn whole-cloth the decisions of the states to authorize and license gaming that is online their particular borders.

‘Sheldon Adelson’s power over politicians, especially those running for president, is significant, but Congress must show it is stronger,’ warned Pappas.

While Graham was presenting his legislation to an empty Senate, Pappas was at Sacramento, handling a hearing of California’s General Assembly Committee on Governmental Organization on the feasibility legalizing poker that is online the state.

‘There is no public policy justification for the status quo,’ he told the committee. ‘Doing there is nothing not a choice. Now’s the time for the legislature to manage Internet poker.’

Nevada Gaming Regulators Focusing On Rules For Skill Games

The gaming industry hopes that skill-based slots could draw a younger demographic back in to the machines. (Image: Julie Jacobson/AP)

Nevada is preparing to introduce games at casinos that will allow you to just test your skill just as much as your luck.

But the rules for such games still need to be written, which is what regulators and manufacturers tried to focus on together this week.

On Wednesday, representatives from gaming equipment companies met up with Nevada regulators for a workshop in the rules and regulations which will govern slot machines that include skill elements.

The 2 sides were working on putting together a draft for the new rules.

Brand New Games, New Rules

At first look, it might seem such as an easy task: merely change a couple of lines of existing slots regulations and be done along with it. But the range of opportunities for skill-based elements in games means the old rules merely make little sense with one of these new games.

New games could enable multiple players about the same machines and payout that is variable. Some may even integrate networking that is social to make them more attractive.

‘The game may not look like a slot machine,’ said Attorney Dan Reaser, representing the Association of Gaming Equipment, as he held up a tablet that is mobile show the changing face for the gaming industry. ‘It’s about bringing the next big thing to the gaming market.’

According to Reaser, age would like to start to see the regulations define three different forms of games: those based on chance, those based on ability, and games that are hybrid combine the two elements.

Skill Games Built to Attract Young Audience

It offers been no secret in the gaming industry that slots, long the driver that is largest of profits for casinos, simply are maybe not as attractive to younger generations of gamblers.

Industry officials are hoping that by allowing players to enjoy arcade-like features and influence their particular results, younger gamblers might come back to the one-armed bandits.

The importance of that task ended up being not lost on those in attendance.

‘This is the absolute most regulation that is important’ve labored on in 17 years,’ said A.G. Burnett, chairman of the Nevada Gaming Control Board. ‘This is a point that is turning could reinvigorate the video slot floor.’

But while this might be the latest attempt to create younger gamblers back once again to the slots flooring, there’s absolutely no guarantee that it will work.

‘ The test that is real be whether or otherwise not a skill-based slot product will be adequate to encourage a more youthful demographic, a consumer group that is showing less interest to pay their time and income on casino games of pure opportunity, like slot machines, than previous generations,’ gaming analyst Pete Trombetta wrote in a study from Moody’s Investors provider.

The good news for the industry is the fact that both the game creators and the state regulators showed up to be on board with the general idea of bringing skill-based games into casinos, though it may still take some time to work out the details.

More workshops are anticipated to take place later this summer time ahead of the regulations are finalized.

Other states may be looking at also the way the Nevada laws play out.

New Jersey also approved skill-based games earlier this year, whether they plan for their regulatory framework to be similar to the one in Nevada though it isn’t clear.

Phil Mickelson Implicated In $2.75 Million Gambling, Money-laundering Case

Is Phil the mystical ‘PM’ mentioned in an court that is initial, now stricken through the record?

Golfer Phil Mickelson is becoming embroiled in a multi-million dollar illegal gambling and money-laundering case.

The five-time winner that is major named by two sources close to ESPN’s beyond your Lines this week as being a ‘gambling client’ of Gregory Silveira, who may have pleaded bad to charges of laundering $2.75 million.

According towards the Outside the relative Lines sources the laundered money belonged to Mickelson, although he is perhaps not named in court documents.

Silveira, a 56-year-old former sports handicapper, stands accused of acting as being a middle-man between a ‘client,’ now alleged to be Mickelson, plus an gambling operation that is offshore.

He plead bad last week to three counts of money laundering and you will be sentenced on October 4.

The court heard that in March 2010, Silveira received a cable transfer of $2.75 million from the client to his bank account.

He proceeded to transfer $2.475 million and the remaining $275,000 into two various bank-account, both in their name.

‘Money Laundering of Funds from PM’

‘At the time, defendant initiated these three transfers with the intent to promote the holding on of an illegal gambling procedure,’ claimed the plea agreement, although court papers do not expose whether or not the funds represented wins or losses, or simply cash being moved into an offshore gambling account.

According to Outside the Lines, a youthful version of Silveira’s plea agreement contained a reference to ‘money laundering of funds from P.M.’

When Outside Lines made inquiries about to who the initials belonged, the prosecution applied to have the initial document stricken through the records plus an amended version showed up the day that is next.

It’s standard DoJ policy to omit the names of third-parties who are not charged with a crime that is specific.

FBI Investigation

It’s maybe not the first-time that that Mickelson’s name has surfaced in connection with alleged financial wrongdoing.

In 2014 he found himself under research by the FBI and SEC for alleged insider trading in Clorox stock.

He had been cleared of one instance, but it remains uncertain whether a second suspicious event is nevertheless being analyzed by authorities.

And like many golfers, he’s recognized to enjoy the odd wager, whether its proposition betting regarding the course or staking big sums on the Super Bowl in Las Vegas.

In 2001, he got in hot water more than a friendly bet that Jim Furyk would hole a bunker shot for par during a seven-hole playoff against Tiger Woods in the NEC Invitational. Gambling is a strict breach of PGA Tour policy.

Both Mickelson and his attorney declined to comment on the matter when they were approached by away from Lines this week.